By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
Patriot WirePatriot Wire
Notification Show More
Latest News
NATO member looks to buy more tanks for Ukraine – media
June 1, 2023
Trump Expresses Sympathy After Biden’s Fall: ‘Well I Hope He Wasn’t Hurt’
June 1, 2023
Report: Hunter Biden’s Attorneys to Use Pro-2A SCOTUS Ruling to Avoid Prosecution on Possible Gun Charges
June 1, 2023
Exclusive: Jim Banks Asks Pentagon to Ban All Drag Queen Shows on Military Bases
June 1, 2023
Let’s Just Be Honest, Nationalism In Almost Every Regard Would Save America
June 1, 2023
Aa
  • Home
  • U.S.
  • World
  • Politics
  • 2A
  • Entertainment
  • Opinion
  • Finance
  • Health
  • My Bookmarks
Reading: Trump Vindicated as DOJ Releases Mueller Memo on Not Prosecuting Trump
Share
Patriot WirePatriot Wire
Aa
  • Home
  • U.S.
  • World
  • Politics
  • 2A
  • Entertainment
  • Opinion
  • Finance
  • Health
  • My Bookmarks
Search
  • Home
  • U.S.
  • World
  • Politics
  • 2A
  • Entertainment
  • Opinion
  • Finance
  • Health
  • My Bookmarks
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
Patriot Wire > Politics > Trump Vindicated as DOJ Releases Mueller Memo on Not Prosecuting Trump
Politics

Trump Vindicated as DOJ Releases Mueller Memo on Not Prosecuting Trump

Breitbart
Breitbart August 24, 2022
Updated 2022/08/24 at 10:11 PM
Share
SHARE

The Department of Justice (DOJ) released a 2019 memorandum Wednesday that explained that then-President Donald Trump should not be prosecuted for obstruction of justice because his statements about the Mueller investigation had a valid purpose.

The memo, prepared on the basis of Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation into Russia “collusion,” and sent to then-Attorney General William Barr, found that Trump’s attacks on the investigation were motivated by legitimate frustration.

Furthermore, the memo concluded that Trump could not be prosecuted for his statements about the investigation or criticisms of cooperating witnesses without intruding on the president’s authority to control the executive branch under the Constitution.

Politico reported Wednesday:

In the nine-page memo disclosed Wednesday, two of the most senior officials in the Justice Department advised then-Attorney General William Barr that Trump’s threats to fire Mueller and his various public and private outbursts against witnesses he viewed as hostile or unhelpful to him didn’t amount to the sort of case prosecutors would bring under their established standards.

“Having reviewed the Report in light of the governing legal principles, and the Principles of Federal Prosecution, we conclude that none of those instances would warrant a prosecution for obstruction of justice, without regard to the constitutional constraint on bringing such an action against a sitting president,” the assistant attorney general for the Office of Legal Counsel, Steven Engel, and Principal Associate Deputy Attorney General Edward O’Callaghan wrote in the March 24, 2019, memo.

 …

In the memo that triggered the disclosure fight, Engel and O’Callaghan concluded that Trump’s conduct primarily reflected a frustration with the Mueller probe and what he perceived to be the politics behind it, as well as news reports they said Trump genuinely believed were flawed. They also suggested that Trump’s exhortations to some of his top allies against “flipping” were meant to prevent them from delivering false testimony — not to conceal the truth.

Mueller had known early in the investigation that there was no evidence of any so-called Russia “collusion,” though he and the prosecutors working for him tried to build a case for charging the president with obstruction of justice in the investigation.

The memo was sought by left-leaning Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW), who fought a years-long legal battle to obtain the memo, in the hope it would turn up evidence of some kind of coverup to protect Trump.

That suspicion was the basis for claims by Democrats that Trump had somehow “politicized” the DOJ: if the department would not release such documents, and would not call for Trump to be prosecuted, it therefore must have been “politicized.”

Joel B. Pollak is Senior Editor-at-Large at Breitbart News and the host of Breitbart News Sunday on Sirius XM Patriot on Sunday evenings from 7 p.m. to 10 p.m. ET (4 p.m. to 7 p.m. PT). He is the author of the recent e-book, Neither Free nor Fair: The 2020 U.S. Presidential Election. His recent book, RED NOVEMBER, tells the story of the 2020 Democratic presidential primary from a conservative perspective. He is a winner of the 2018 Robert Novak Journalism Alumni Fellowship. Follow him on Twitter at @joelpollak.

Breitbart August 24, 2022
Share this Article
Facebook TwitterEmail Print
Leave a comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

  • NATO member looks to buy more tanks for Ukraine – media
  • Trump Expresses Sympathy After Biden’s Fall: ‘Well I Hope He Wasn’t Hurt’
  • Report: Hunter Biden’s Attorneys to Use Pro-2A SCOTUS Ruling to Avoid Prosecution on Possible Gun Charges
  • Exclusive: Jim Banks Asks Pentagon to Ban All Drag Queen Shows on Military Bases
  • Let’s Just Be Honest, Nationalism In Almost Every Regard Would Save America

Recent Comments

No comments to show.

You Might Also Like

Politics

Trump Expresses Sympathy After Biden’s Fall: ‘Well I Hope He Wasn’t Hurt’

June 1, 2023
Politics

Report: Hunter Biden’s Attorneys to Use Pro-2A SCOTUS Ruling to Avoid Prosecution on Possible Gun Charges

June 1, 2023
Politics

Exclusive: Jim Banks Asks Pentagon to Ban All Drag Queen Shows on Military Bases

June 1, 2023
Politics

MS-13 Gang Members, Released into U.S. by Feds, Among Illegal Aliens Charged with 15-Year-Old Boy’s Murder

June 1, 2023

© Patriot Media. All Rights Reserved.

  • Home
  • U.S.
  • World
  • Politics
  • 2A
  • Entertainment
  • Opinion
  • Finance
  • Health
  • My Bookmarks

Removed from reading list

Undo
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Register Lost your password?